Essay Re-Draft

In this essay I will be deconstructing these two images by using the process of Semiotics, Binary Opposites and Symbolism. During one of our media lessons we learnt all about Semiotics, Semiotics, is the study of signs we use Semiotics when deconstructing photos like these because we can see if any of these photos have gone through a mediation process and in some cases we get to find out the significance of the photos and their true meaning. Charles Sanders Pearce was the founder of the philosophical doctrine known as pragmatisim.
We also learnt about Binary Oppositions, binary opposition is a pair of theoretical opposites. In structuralism it is seen as a fundamental organizer of human philosophy, culture, and language. In the mid-20th century, two major European academic thinkers, Claude Levi Strauss and Roland Barthes thought that the way we understand certain words depends not so much on any meaning they themselves,
The final thing we learnt about within this lesson was Symbolism; Symbolism is the use of symbols to represent things such as ideas and emotions. Symbolism is sometimes used to refer specifically to symbols that stand on their own.

The Statue Of Liberty is the heart of America, it gave immigrants a sense of well being and safety and hope of a better life, its something Americans look to for guidance and it reminds people of how fortunate they are to have gained there Independence. However on September 11th 2001 two hijacked planes launched into the twin towers shattering Americas hope and creating fear and panic amongst the nation. The main Binary Opposition within this photo is that of hope and fear the light shining on the Statue could almost be seen as Godly as if God is saying you will get through this, however there is part of this photo that makes me think why? why did this photographer decide to take this photo in this why? why did he decided to document this particular part of New York on September 11th and not the actual scene itself?

Narrative Theory Homework

TASK 1:
Todorov's Narrative Structure For Lion King.
1:Simba Is Born Is Next In Line To Rule The Kingdom
2:Simba's Uncle Wants To Be King So He Kills Muffasa And Makes Simba Believe He Killed Him
3:Scar Tells Simba To Run Away He Does And Meets Timon And Pumba And Has A Better Life And Forgets About The Past
4:Simba Grows Up And An Old Friend Bumps Into Him And Convinces Him To Come Back To Fight Scar And Take is Place As King
5:Simba Fights Scar And Kills Him And Becomes King

Todorov's Narrative Structure For Mrs Doubtfire.
1:Daniel Thows His Son A Birthday Party Miranda Comes Home Flips Out And Asks Daniel For A Divorce
2:At A Custody Hearing Court Gives Miranda Sole Custody Until Daniel Sorts Himself Out
3:Miranda Sends Out A Advertisement For A House Keeper, Daniel Changes The Number On The Ad And Decides To Apply For The Job Himself And Creates Mrs Doubtfire
4:At A Restaurant For Mirandas Birthday Daniels Cover Is Blown And His Visitation Rights Are Cut Down And Have To Be Supervised.
5:Mrs Doubtfire Gets Her Own Television Show And Miranda Realises Her Children Need Their Father And Gives Him Full Visitation Rights.

Todorovs Narrative Structure For PS I Love You
1:Holly And Gerry Start Off Having An Argument. After The Arument Gerry Makes Holly Laugh And All Is Well.
2:Gerry Then Dies From A Brain Tumour And Holly Finds It Hard To Let Go Of Gerry
3:At Holly's Birthday Gathering She Recives A Present From Gerry Which Gives Her Instructions That She Has To Follow.
4:Holly Goes To Ireland To Visit Gerry's Family And She Meets Tom Who Knew Gerry When He Was Young, And He Gives Holly The Strength To Move On.
5:HollY Takes Her Mother To Ireland And She Stays With Tom.

Both of these images shocked the world when they were first put into the public eye. They created conspiracy,devastation and questions that the world wanted to know the answers too. Both of the images document devastation however there is something about these two images that spark questions such as "have these photos been set up" or "why have they decided to put a particular element into the photo",within this photo you can also see the destruction of the surrounding building . The Statue Of Liberty connotes Americas freedom and Independence and when 9/11 happened all of that seemed to be taken away. The interesting thing about this image is the way the statue has been lit; The statue looks all clean and polished and the lighting gives the statue beauty perhaps stating that America will over come the destruction but that almost seems short lived when you see the thick black smoke behind it. The statue looks photo shopped in its presence and it seems like two different images are happening within the same photo for example, the statue looks like a photo was taken of it on a nice sunny calm day which is controversial in the reality of the image, and the rest of the image was taken on September 11th and both images have been merged together to create this new image with loads of different meanings. The image seems very setup almost as if someone wanted to create this weird yet wonderful image.

In the second image we see the destruction of the Pentagon with the White House standing promptly behind it, this image is a strange one to deconstruct because there are so many possibilities as to why the image has been set up like this; The main one that stands out to me is that the White House shows Americas power and how its government will protect it, yet in the foreground of the image we see Americas ministry of defence all broken and defeated, its almost saying your not safe anymore or perhaps the government can't do anything to save you now, and with the destruction of the Pentagon it could perhaps be blaming the government for this devastation. Another reason this image could of been documented this way because it wants to show the corruption of the government and it could also be saying the white house could be the next target for a terrorism attack, it could also be saying that America is getting weaker.

Both of the images show Americas destruction but i don't think they are showing the true devistation.

Editing Terms

Cut A visual transition created in editing in which one shot is instantaneously replaced on screen by another.
Continuity Editing:Editing that creates action that flows smoothly across shots and scenes without jarring visual inconsistencies. Establishes a sense of story for the viewer.
Cross Cutting:Cutting back and forth quickly between two or more lines of action, indicating they are happening simultaneously.
Dissolve: A gradual scene transition. The editor overlaps the end of one shot with the beginning of the next one.
Editing :The work of selecting and joining together shots to create a finished film.
errors of continuity Disruptions in the flow of a scene, such as a failure to match action or the placement of props across shots.
Establishing Shot: A shot, normally taken from a great distance or from a "bird's eye view," that establishes where the action is about to occur.
eyeline match The matching of eyelines between two or more characters. For example, if Sam looks to the right in shot A, Jean will look to the left in shot B. This establishes a relationship of proximity and continuity.
Fade: A visual transition between shots or scenes that appears on screen as a brief interval with no picture. The editor fades one shot to black and then fades in the next. Often used to indicate a change in time and place.
Final Cut:The finished edit of a film, approved by the director and the producer. This is what the audience sees.
Iris: Visible on screen as a circle closing down over or opening up on a shot. Seldom used in contemporary film, but common during the silent era of Hollywood films.
jump cut A cut that creates a lack of continuity by leaving out parts of the action.
matched cut A cut joining two shots whose compositional elements match, helping to establish strong continuity of action.
montage Scenes whose emotional impact and visual design are achieved through the editing together of many brief shots. The shower scene from Psycho is an example of montage editing.
rough cut The editor's first pass at assembling the shots into a film, before tightening and polishing occurs.
Sequence Shot: A long take that extends for an entire scene or sequence. It is composed of only one shot with no editing.
shot reverse shot cutting:Usually used for conversation scenes, this technique alternates between over-the-shoulder shots showing each character speaking.
wipe Visible on screen as a bar travelling across the frame pushing one shot off and pulling the next shot into place. Rarely used in contemporary film, but common in films from the 1930s and 1940s.

Does The Media Merely Reflect Society Or Is It Instrumental In Constructing it

The media is around us 24 hours a day 365 days of the year, there's no escaping it, even when we try to switch of the reality TV and look for a movie to put on or find a nice magazine to read we still somehow manage to see this "world" we live in but presented in different ways, which strikes the question "Does The Media Merely Reflect Society Or Is It Instrumental In Constructing it".

I'm the first person to admit television is a good way to unwind after a hard day at school/work but do shows like "Waterloo Road" or "Eastenders" reflect society or are they creating this image of how society should be seen in today's world.In my opinion I think programmes like this are showing us today's society but I think they exaggerate it 100 times so we see a false image of society rather than the real thing.

Shows such as Eastenders document something quite interesting on television, affairs,death,sexuality and mental illnesses and they seem to do it to the extreme; Every Christmas evening thousands of people tune into Eastenders or Hollyoaks just to see how the big story of the year ends whether it be in a death or in someone walking out. So what is it that makes these shows so appealing to watch? I personally think that these shows are so appealing because they are showing a new take on life and although they are exaggerated by 100 we get too see how these people are dealing with the issues infront of them and i think that is what makes these shows so interesting.

Reality TV is another way the media try to show us what the world is like by documenting people living they're lived for example the popular American show "The Hills" gives us an incite on how people in LA are living they're lives by showing us they're nights out and how they do they're day jobs.This setup of TV is amongst the most popular viewing of the British public, and i think it is so popular because all the people we see on reality TV we either want to be them or we can relate to they're emotions and most of the arguments we see them having we can safely say "I've had that argument before." However not everyone feels this way an article published by http://www.contactmusic.com/
shows an opinion of a very high thought of British actor.
"British actor Stephen Fry has launched a scathing attack on the popularity of reality TV shows, insisting the format is "picking over the remains of life". The Gosford Park star, currently appearing in British small screen drama Kingdom, is disgusted by much of the competition his Sunday night show faces. Speaking to The Stage he says of reality programmes, "I would rather skewer my own eyeballs out of their sockets with a blunt bodkin than I would watch (them). "I thrive on creativity, energy and excitement."

This view on reality TV is a popular one with most people and I think they feel this way because they don't quite understand why these peoples lives are broadcast on popular television channels and why they are being broadcast in a certain way;In my opinion I feel reality television is false image society, i feel this way because in some reality televisions shows like The Hills the majority of the people we see are living the high life and earning thousands of dollars and I think we should be able to see what "real" America is like for example normal working families.

When Big Brother first hit our screens in 1999 it took the Television world by storm, suddenly seeing complete strangers living together for 2months seemed intersting, but why? People enjoy seeing other peoples misfortunes e.g. when someone falls over or when two people are having a heated argument it makes us feel somewhat better about ourselves in the sense that we would probably say to ourselves "im glad thats not me".

Magazines fill the local newsagents shelves by the hundreds, magazines like "That's Life" and "Take A Break" never seem to disappoint with stories such as "My husband killed my baby" or "Pregnancy Made Me Eat My Hair" these magazines are my favorite ones to read i feel this way because these stories are written by real people and you are seeing how the story has influenced their lives.

However some magazines such as "Heat" or "Star" don't display such stories on their front cover;The stories we see on the covers of these magazines often read like this "Posh Weight Battle" or "Fern Battles Holly" these stories really frustrate me because they aren't real life, to be honest i don't care if Victoria Beckham as lost another 2 stone or if Fern Britain is battling for her job. The models we see in these magazines that appear to be "beautiful" is not a true image of how today's women look in today's society and i think this is the reason most of today's teenagers are so obsessed with looking good or have this image of what the "perfect" person is like so in this aspect of the question "Does The Media Merely Reflect Society Or Is It Instrumental In Constructing it" i think the media is helping construct society by publishing these sorts of stories. In my opinion i would like to see more of the stories that are published in "Thats Life" in magazines like "Heat" because they are real people talking about real issues.

My personal opinion is the media works in two different ways, in most ways we depend on the media for an awful lot,although we don't like admitting it we like watching reality television and we like reading the newspapers to see what the government has been up too this week, but I also think the media is to blame for how society is changing and how peoples behaviour has changed.The media is often blaming the music we listen to for the way we behave, but i feel that its mostly the media to blame for teenagers being anorexic and teenagers being out on the streets every evening,I feel the media glamorise the world it is putting infront of us.So i think the media is instrumental in creating todays society.

Media Shots

Seven Opening

The opening scene of Seven focuses in on a man (played by Morgan freeman) getting ready for his daily trip to work; The man seems to be taking his time getting ready which could suggest he is not enthusiastic about his job, he is seen putting on a suit which suggests to the audience he is in a job with high importance, diagetic sound is used in this scene to create a naturalistic setting to the scene, this scene is also very simple because in reality this scene is just a man getting ready but when you break it down and pick out all of the details it is quite complex in what it is representing.

As the scene progresses we see the man go into an apartment were a murder investigation of a young woman is taking place indicating that Morgan Freeman is playing the part of a polce oficer; This gives us an incite as too what the basis of this film is going to be about; during this scene we meet two more characters one of which is played by Brad Pitt the way Brad Pitt's character is introduced the audience can immediately see the difference in the two characters;For example Morgan Freeman's character seem cool calm and collected and he is very well set out in regard to what he is wearing his suit is all pristine and nothing is out of place but when you compare him to Brad Pitt's character we get a totally different opinion. From the outset Brad Pitts character seems cocky and aware of his status at his work place, the fact that his outfit is all scruffy e.g. the shirt hanging out and the looseness of his jacket and the chewing of his gum suggest he's not to fussed about this enquiry but he just wants to get it over and done with this could also be interpreted by the way Brad Pitt's character is talking to Morgan Freeman's character because to the audience it seems very degrading and like he's the man in charge and Morgan Freeman just works for him.

As the characters leave the apartment the camera cuts to a shot of them on a city street, even tho the audience doesn't know what city it is exactly the diagetic sound we hear suggests it is a busy city which works very well in setting the overall pace of the film.

We are then brought back to the apartment at the very beginning; We see Morgan Freeman's character lying in bed again this scene is very simple because all he is doing is lying in bed watching television but its what he does after that that makes the scene worth watching, as he turns the television off he turns on a metronome the ticking noise of the metronome is similar to that of a clock which could be perceived as a comfort to him this could foreshadow his characters actions for the rest of the film on the other hand it could be perceived as a thing to drown out the noise of the street outside.

As we move into the opening credits the colour scheme of the credits are black white and red the these colours are often used because they catch peoples eyes and they make more of an impact to the audience. It is during the credits we get introduced to the third main character the "killer" and this is when the theme of the film starts coming together, although we never see the killers face what we do see oh him/her is their hands cutting out things and putting them into a book and it is this that keeps the audience watching because we want to know Whats in that book? Why are we seeing him stick things into the book? What is its relevance? The music within this scene is quite rocky which gives the audience a rush of adrenaline that makes us keep watching the film to see how the "killer" is going to interact with the two police oficers.

Media Manifesto

Everytime someone asks me how i would describe myself i always end up doing the "typical" answer which in a way is the boring answer too lol; I guess if i could descrie myself i'd say i was hard working and always willing to learn new tasks, i'm not very confident in my writing skills but i feel i make up for that in my presntational and disscusion work (basically im saying i like to talk alot), i feel i am a helpful student in the sense that if anybody is strugling i will try my bets to make them understand the work.

During the course of year 10 i was always predicted to acheive D-G's and after i sat my mocks those TMG's were brought up to C's and above accept in maths even tho i got a C in my mock for maths the government still thought i would get a D but with hard work i got my C in maths and i was over the moon :) All together i acheived 10 GCSE'S all A-C and in my opinion that was the best i could of ever dreamed of getting, i even got a C in R.E which admitingly i didn't try very hard on so it proves coming in at 7am to revise really does work :)

I chose Media AS because i really enjoyed the GCSE and i feel that the AS would be a continuation of the fun i had at GCSE; The media is all around us every day and i like understanding why certain media texts are put together the way they have and i think the AS will help me understand it even more.

At the end of year 12 i hope to achieve a grade B in AS media studies and i think that if i work as hard as i did in year 11 this goal will be easily achieved.

Take 3

Hopefully with this blog i'll remember my password :),

I know im not a film student but DORIAN GRAY is awsome :) and i was sitting there watching it mesmerised by the way it was flimed, it was £8.50 well spent.